Question 1

Is Goalz a Jira alternative?

Accepted Answer

For services firms, yes — but with a different centre of gravity. Jira is built around the issue; Goalz is built around delivery economics, so it covers HR, leave, access control and productivity scoring that Jira leaves to other tools. If your team lives in complex engineering workflows, Jira is deeper at the issue level.

Question 2

Can Jira track approved versus logged hours?

Accepted Answer

Not natively. Jira reports time logged against issues, and marketplace apps add timesheet features on top. The concept Goalz uses — spent hours claimed by the developer, approved hours signed off or moderated by a manager, and only approved hours counting toward productivity — is not something Jira models.

Question 3

Does Jira do productivity scoring?

Accepted Answer

It produces velocity, burndown and cycle-time reports about the team. It does not produce a weighted, auditable productivity score per person built on approved hours, and Atlassian would not claim it does. Firms that want that usually build it in a spreadsheet from Jira exports.

Question 4

Can we keep Jira for engineering and use Goalz for the rest?

Accepted Answer

Yes, and some teams do exactly that during a transition. Engineering stays in Jira, while HR, leave, access and the delivery and productivity reporting run in Goalz. It is not the tidiest end state, but it is a legitimate one.

Question 5

Which is cheaper?

Accepted Answer

Jira alone is usually cheaper than Goalz. Once you add an HR product, a leave tracker and a timesheet app from the marketplace, the combined figure typically exceeds Goalz Growth at $11 per user per month, and you are managing several subscriptions instead of one.

Question 6

What about the Atlassian marketplace?

Accepted Answer

It is a genuine advantage and worth weighing. If your workflow depends on specific marketplace apps, that is a real reason to stay. The trade-off is that each app is another subscription, another vendor and another permission model.

Question 7

Is Goalz easier for non-engineers to use?

Accepted Answer

That is our design intent — HR staff, delivery managers and clients all use the same platform, so it cannot assume engineering habits. Judge it in a trial rather than taking our word for it.

Capability	Goalz	Jira + add-ons
Issue tracking depth and custom workflows	Standard	Best in class
Plugin and marketplace ecosystem	Limited	Very large
Developer tool integration	Commit visibility	Deep and native
Sprint planning with per-person hours	Included	Add-on
Milestones with schedule health	Included	Advanced Roadmaps tier
Employee records, teams, designations	Included	Not offered
Leave policies and approvals	Included	Not offered
Leave reducing sprint capacity	Automatic	Not offered
Approved hours, distinct from logged hours	Native	Not modelled
Manager moderation of approved hours	Included	Not offered
Weighted productivity scoring per person	Configurable per team	Not offered
Score breakup down to a ticket	Every score expands	Not offered
PM performance scorecard	Included	Not offered
Client portal with sign-off	Included	Add-on
Menu-level access across HR and delivery	One role	Delivery only
Number of subscriptions to manage	One	Several

Goalz vs Jira: issue tracking depth, or the whole delivery picture?

Should you choose Goalz or Jira?

Who each one is actually for.

What you get, and what you have to assemble

Per user, per month

Where Jira is the better answer.

Not sure which one fits?

Questions people ask when comparing

Bring a real sprint from Jira.